The Declaration of Istanbul on Organ Trafficking and Transplant Tourism

Organ commercialism, which targets vulnerable populations (such as illiterate and impoverished persons, undocumented immigrants, prisoners, and political or economic refugees) in resource-poor countries, has been condemned by international bodies such as the World Health Organization for decades. Yet in recent years, as a consequence of the increasing ease of Internet communication and the willingness of patients in rich countries to travel and purchase organs, organ trafficking and transplant tourism have grown into global problems. For example, as of 2006, foreigners received two-thirds of the 2000 kidney transplants performed annually in Pakistan.

The Istanbul Declaration proclaims that the poor who sell their organs are being exploited, whether by richer people within their own countries or by transplant tourists from abroad. Moreover, transplant tourists risk physical harm by unregulated and illegal transplantation. Participants in the Istanbul Summit concluded that transplant commercialism, which targets the vulnerable, transplant tourism, and organ trafficking should be prohibited. And they also urged their fellow transplant professionals, individually and through their organizations, to put an end to these unethical activities and foster safe, accountable practices that meet the needs of transplant recipients while protecting donors.

Countries from which transplant tourists originate, as well as those to which they travel to obtain transplants, are just beginning to address their respective responsibilities to protect their people from exploitation and to develop national self-sufficiency in organ donation. The Declaration should reinforce the resolve of governments and international organizations to develop laws and guidelines to bring an end to wrongful practices. "The legacy of transplantation is threatened by organ trafficking and transplant tourism. The Declaration of Istanbul aims to combat these activities and to preserve the nobility of organ donation. The success of transplantation as a life-saving treatment does not require—nor justify—victimizing the world's poor as the source of organs for the rich" (Steering Committee of the Istanbul Summit).

Interpreting Results of Clinical Trials: A Conceptual Framework

Diagnosing Hypertension by Intradialytic Blood Pressure Recordings

Background and objectives: The diagnosis of hypertension among hemodialysis patients by predialysis or postdialysis blood pressure (BP) recordings is imprecise and biased and has poor test-retest reliability. The use of intradialytic BP measurements to diagnose hypertension is unknown.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A diagnostic-test study was done with interdialytic ambulatory BP as reference standard. Index BP recordings tested were: predialysis (method 1), postdialysis (method 2), intradialytic (method 3), intradialytic including predialyis and postdialysis (method 4), and the average of predialysis and postdialysis (method 5). Each index BP was recorded over six consecutive dialysis treatments.

Results: There were differences among index BP measurements in reproducibility, bias, precision, and accuracy. Method 4 was the most reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.70 for systolic and diastolic BP). All 5 measurement methods overestimated 44-h ambulatory systolic BP. Methods 2, 3, or 4 overestimated ambulatory systolic BP by only a small amount. Method 4 was the most precise and accurate. For diagnosis of hypertension, BP cut-point by method 4 of 135/75 mmHg, had a sensitivity of 90.4% and specificity of 75.9% for systolic BP (area under ROC curve 0.90). Median cut-off systolic BP of 140 mmHg from a single dialysis provides approximately 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity in diagnosing systolic hypertension; a median cut-off diastolic BP of 80 mmHg provides approximately 75% sensitivity and 75% specificity in diagnosing diastolic hypertension.

Conclusions: Consideration of intradialytic BP measurements together with predialysis and postdialysis BP measurements improves the reproducibility, bias, precision, and accuracy of BP measurement compared with predialysis or postdialysis measurements.

Want to live longer? Take the stairs instead of the elevator.

BBC: Over the 12 weeks of the study, the volunteers, who were hospital employees at the university, were asked to use the stairs exclusively at work instead of taking the lift. On average, the number of flights of stairs - classed as climbing up or down one storey - rose from five per day to 23. After the three months of the trial, tests showed they had better lung capacity, blood pressure and cholesterol measurements. Their weight, body fat and waist measurements also dropped, and their capacity for doing aerobic exercise improved. Taken together, this equates to a 15% reduction in the chances of dying young, say the investigators.

Preoperative Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Is Associated with Increased Risk for Acute Kidney Injury after Cardiovascular Surgery

Background and objectives: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs commonly after cardiac surgery. Most patients who undergo cardiac surgery receive long-term treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB). The aim of this study was to determine whether long-term use of ACEI/ARB is associated with an increased incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: This was a retrospective cohort study of 1358 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2005, in two tertiary care hospitals in Buffalo, NY. The incidence of AKI was determined after cardiac surgery. Clinical data were collected using a standardized form that included comorbid condition, use of ACEI/ARB, and intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Results: Overall, 40.2% of patients developed AKI. Preoperative variables that were significantly associated with development of AKI included increasing age; nonwhite race; combined valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting compared with coronary artery bypass grafting alone; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Risk Score category 4/5 compared with 2 to 3; presence of diabetes, congestive heart failure, or neurologic disease at baseline; use of ACEI/ARB; and emergency surgery. Intra- and postoperative factors that were associated with postoperative AKI were hypotension during surgery, use of vasopressors, and postoperative hypotension. Multiple regression logistic model confirmed an independent and significant association of AKI and preoperative use of ACEI/ARB. This was confirmed using a bivariate-probit and propensity score model that adjusts for confounding by indication of use and selection bias.

Conclusions: Preoperative use of ACEI/ARB is associated with a 27.6% higher risk for AKI postoperatively. Stopping ACEI or ARB before cardiac surgery may reduce the incidence of AKI.